Thursday, August 13, 2009

090403001 Statement of recommendation



To whom it may concern


It
gives me great pleasure and satisfaction to recommend Yuju Lee for
University of California, Berkeley’s summer Statistics Program.
I have known him for over two years now and in this period I was
impressed by his marvelous growth and development which is not only
apparent in his academic and leadership achievements but in maturity
and his character as well.


Yuju
is a departmental of Scholars in Department of Statistics. He has
been actively participating in our Center for Environmental
Statistics at UCLA, since fall 2007. He has very strong quantitative
skills which sometimes leave many of his fellow students amazed and
often are a source of surprise for the academic staff. His mental
skills speak for themselves when he is participating in any academic
activity. Yuju entered in our academic program as all other students
do but soon he made himself stand out from others by demonstrating
his excellent quantitative and mental skills and above all a hunger
to learn more. This made him earn respect and understanding of his
fellow students and his teachers both. At some occasions he has
demonstrated a skill to solve problems with a new approach which is
unheard of by his fellow students. Where other students hear he
listens, where they practice he perfects and above all he takes
initiative where others are still in the process of deciding.


One
of the pre-requisites for enrollment as departmental of Scholars is
an overall GPA of 3.5. Yuju has a GPA higher than our requirement. He
masters many of the popular statistical software packages and many
times pointed out anomalies and limitations of software packages.
Corrections, suggestions and recommendations made by Yuju have
sometimes resulted in incorporation of these in later versions of
software packages.



After going through the details of your summer Statistics Program I
find it to be one of the most suitable ones from which Yuju can
benefit. Besides his strong quantitative skills, mentioned earlier,
he has demonstrated and achieved good results in Calculus. His GPA is
3.568. Not only will this program help Yuju in completing his
research paper he is working on but also he would certainly be most
benefited by this program in his years to come in professional and
practical life.


Besides
academics Yuju follows other interests as well. He has a passion for
music and computers. He is never at loss in making friends. It only
takes him a short while for him and he remains no stranger in any
type of social and academic gatherings. He makes friends and is
befriended easily. In academic discussions he has this distinctive
quality of proving his point without airing any opposition. He also
has a quality of discussing any matter academically, without
prejudice and pride.


Yuju
Lee is an extraordinary young man. As his adviser in Applied
Mathematics and Statistics I have witnessed many examples of his
talents and have been more than impressed by his diligence and work
ethics. He has outstanding organizational skills. He has the ability
to work on several diversified tasks simultaneously and has never
disappointed anyone, as far as I know, in delivering the results in
specified time despite deadline and pressures. Besides his research
work that he is doing under my supervision he is also planning to
write a book on Statistical Analysis. I have reviewed parts of his
scribbled notes and I am impressed. He has also headed groups of
students in various projects. His presentation skills are marvelous
and the audience is more than willing to hear what he has to say or
demonstrate. He is a source of encouragement for other students and
many of them have improved their grades by following his example. For
the time he has been with me he has always been one of the top three
students in his class. His above average performance is a direct
result of his dedication and hard work alone.


If
your summer Environmental Statistics program is looking for
exceptionally good candidates with excellent record then Yuju Lee is
the right choice. He has consistently shown the ability to meet
challenges which come his way.


To
conclude, I would like to strongly recommend Yuju Lee for you summer
Environmental Statistics program. If you have any further queries
regarding Yuju’s abilities, please do not hesitate to contact
me.


Sincerely,







Jan de Leeuw
Chair
Department of Statistics
Center for
Environmental Statistics
UCLA



090403002 Cardiovascular Disease



CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES


Cardiovascular
disease is caused by disorders of the heart and blood vessels, and
includes coronary heart disease (heart attacks), cerebrovascular
disease (stroke), raised blood pressure (hypertension), peripheral
artery disease, rheumatic heart disease, congenital heart disease and
heart failure. The major causes of cardiovascular disease are tobacco
use, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet.


Cardiovascular
diseases (CVDs) are a group of disorders of the heart and blood
vessels and include:




  • Coronary heart disease – disease of the blood vessels
    supplying the heart muscle



  • Cerebrovascular disease - disease of the blood vessels supplying the
    brain



  • Peripheral arterial disease – disease of blood vessels
    supplying the arms and legs



  • Rheumatic heart disease – damage to the heart muscle and heart
    valves from rheumatic fever, caused by streptococcal bacteria



  • Congenital heart disease - malformations of heart structure existing
    at birth.



  • Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism – blood clots in
    the leg veins, which can dislodge and move to the heart and lungs.



Cardiovascular
disease now ranks as the world's top cause of death, causing one
third of all deaths globally. Heart disease can no longer be seen as
the problem of overworked, overweight middle-aged men in developed
countries. In today's world, women and children too are at risk.
Already, 75% of all CVD deaths occur in the poorer regions of the
world, and this is likely to increase in the future.


G

Figure
1: (Mackay and Mensah)


lobally, cardiovascular diseases are the number one cause of
death and are projected to remain so. An estimated 17.5 million
people died from cardiovascular disease in 2005, representing 30% of
all global deaths. Of these deaths, 7.6 million were due to heart
attacks and 5.7 million due to stroke. About 80% of these deaths
occurred in low- and middle-income countries. If current trends are
allowed to continue, by 2015 an estimated 20 million people will die
from cardiovascular disease (mainly from heart attacks and strokes).
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the greatest cause of morbidity and
mortality in the developed and developing world. Although women
perceive breast cancer as their most common danger, they are seven
times more likely to die from CVD (Jackson, 2008).


Cardiovascular
diseases include coronary heart disease (heart attacks),
cerebrovascular disease, raised blood pressure (hypertension),
peripheral artery disease, rheumatic heart disease, congenital heart
disease and heart failure. The major causes of cardiovascular disease
are tobacco use, physical inactivity, and an unhealthy diet.


Heart
attacks and strokes are usually acute events and are mainly caused by
a blockage that prevents blood from flowing to the heart or brain.
The most common reason for this is a build-up of fatty deposits on
the inner walls of the blood vessels that supply the heart or brain.
Strokes can also be caused by bleeding from a blood vessel in the
brain or from blood clots.



The causes of CVDs are well established and well known. The most
important causes of heart disease and stroke are unhealthy diet,
physical inactivity and tobacco use. These are called 'modifiable
risk factors'. The effects of unhealthy diet and physical inactivity
may show up in individuals as raised blood pressure, raised blood
glucose, raised blood lipids, and overweight and obesity; these are
called 'intermediate risk factors'. The major modifiable risk factors
are responsible for about 80% of coronary heart disease and
cerebrovascular disease. There are also a number of underlying
determinants of chronic diseases, or, if you like, "the causes
of the causes". These are a reflection of the major forces
driving social, economic and cultural change – globalization,
urbanization, and population ageing. Other determinants of CVDs are
poverty and stress.


Often,
there are no symptoms of the underlying disease of the blood vessels.
A heart attack or stroke may be the first warning of underlying
disease. Symptoms of a heart attack include: pain or discomfort in
the centre of the chest; pain or discomfort in the arms, the left
shoulder, elbows, jaw, or back. In addition the person may experience
difficulty in breathing or shortness of breath; feeling sick or
vomiting; feeling light-headed or faint; breaking into a cold sweat;
and becoming pale. Women are more likely to have shortness of breath,
nausea, vomiting, and back or jaw pain. The most common symptom of a
stroke is sudden weakness of the face, arm, or leg, most often on one
side of the body. Other symptoms include sudden onset of: numbness of
the face, arm, or leg, especially on one side of the body; confusion,
difficulty speaking or understanding speech; difficulty seeing with
one or both eyes; difficulty walking, dizziness, loss of balance or
coordination; severe headache with no known cause; and fainting or
unconsciousness. People experiencing these symptoms should seek
medical care immediately.


Rheumatic
heart disease is damage to the heart valves and heart muscle from the
inflammation and scarring caused by rheumatic fever. Rheumatic fever
is caused by streptococcal bacteria, which usually begins as a sore
throat or tonsillitis in children.


Symptoms
of rheumatic heart disease include: shortness of breath, fatigue,
irregular heartbeats, chest pain and fainting. Symptoms of rheumatic
fever include: fever, pain and swelling of the joints, nausea,
stomach cramps and vomiting.


Early
treatment of streptococcal sore throat can stop the development of
rheumatic fever. Regular long-term penicillin treatment can prevent
repeat attacks of rheumatic fever which give rise to rheumatic heart
disease and can stop disease progression in people whose heart valves
are already damaged by the disease.


CVDs
affect many people in middle age, very often severely limiting the
income and savings of affected individuals and their families. Lost
earnings and out of pocket health care payments undermine the
socioeconomic development of communities and nations. CVDs place a
heavy burden on the economies of countries. For example, it is
estimated that over the next 10 years (2006-2015), China will lose
$558 billion in foregone national income due to the combination of
heart disease, stroke and diabetes. Lower socioeconomic groups in
high income countries generally have a greater prevalence of risks
factors, diseases and mortality,. A similar pattern is emerging as
the CVD epidemic evolves in low and middle income countries.


At
least 80% of premature deaths from heart disease and stroke could be
avoided through healthy diet, regular physical activity and avoiding
tobacco smoke. Individuals can reduce their risk of CVDs by engaging
in regular physical activity, avoiding tobacco use and second-hand
tobacco smoke, choosing a diet rich in fruit and vegetables and
avoiding foods that are high in fat, sugar and salt, and maintaining
a healthy body weight. Comprehensive and integrated action is the
means to prevent and control CVDs:




  • Comprehensive action requires combining approaches that seek to
    reduce the risks throughout the entire population with strategies
    that target individuals at high risk or with established disease



  • Examples of population-wide interventions that can be implemented to
    reduce CVDs include: comprehensive tobacco control policies,
    taxation to reduce the intake of foods that are high in fat, sugar
    and salt, building walking and cycle ways to increase physical
    activity, providing healthy school meals to children



  • Integrated approaches focus on the main common risk factors for a
    range of chronic diseases such as CVD, diabetes and cancer:
    unhealthy diet, physically inactivity and tobacco use



Effective
and inexpensive medication is available to treat nearly all CVDs.
After a heart attack or stroke, the risk of a recurrence or death can
be substantially lowered with a combination of drugs­-statins to
lower cholesterol, drugs to lower blood pressure, and aspirin.
Effective medical devices have been developed to treat CVDs, such as
pacemakers, prosthetic valves, and patches for closing holes in the
heart. Operations used to treat CVDs include coronary artery bypass,
balloon angioplasty (where a small balloon-like device is threaded
through an artery to open the blockage), valve repair and
replacement, heart transplantation, and artificial heart operations.
There is a need for increased government investment through national
programs aimed at prevention and control of CVDs and other chronic
diseases.



Above 300 risk factors are associated with cardiovascular diseases.
Some of these risk factors are modifiable, some modifiable to some
extent and others which are not modifiable. High blood pressure,
abnormal blood lipids, use of tobacco, physical inactivity, obesity,
unhealthy diet and diabetes mellitus are all major modifiable risk
factors. High blood pressure is a major risk factor for heart attack
and the most important for stroke. High total cholesterol, LDL
cholesterol and triglycerides with low level of HDL cholesterol
increase the risk for cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Use of
tobacco increases the risks for cardiovascular diseases, especially
for those who started smoking from a very young age and are heavy
smokers; passive smoking is as risky as smoking itself and is an
additional risk. Physical inactivity increases the risk for
cardiovascular diseases by 50%. Obesity is a major risk for
cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Low fruits and vegetables
intake in diets is estimated to be causing 31% of cardiovascular
diseases and 11% of strokes worldwide; intake of high saturated fat
also increases the risks as well by its effect on blood lipids and
thrombosis. Diabetes mellitus is also a major risk for cardiovascular
diseases and stroke.


Other
modifiable risk factors also include low socio-economic status, use
of alcohol, mental illness, use of certain medicines, psychosocial
stress, lipoprotein, left ventricular hypertrophy. Left ventricular
hypertrophy is a strong indicator of approaching cardiovascular
death. Use of some oral contraceptives and hormone replacement
therapies are a cause of increased risk. One or two drinks of alcohol
each day may reduce the risk by as much as 30% but heavy drinking
causes the heart muscle to weaken.


Factors
like ethnicity, gender, family history and advancing age are not
modifiable. Advancing age is the most powerful risk factor; risk of
stroke doubles every decade after 55 years of age. Rates of
cardiovascular diseases are higher in men as compared to women (in
premenopausal age). Risks are higher if a first-degree male relative
has had a cardiovascular disease before 55 years of age or a female
first-degree relative before 65 years of age. Fresh in the line
amongst the risks which are not modifiable are inflammation, abnormal
blood coagulation and excess of increased homocysteine in blood.


Of
the modifiable risks, use of tobacco and high levels of high
triglyceride are offer higher risks to women than men. Moreover,
diabetes, obesity and depression are more prevalent in women. Other
modifiable risks mentioned earlier are same for men and women.


There
are certain risks which are for women only and those are use of oral
contraceptive, hormone replacement therapy, polycystic ovary syndrome
and risk of a heart attack at its highest at the beginning of each
menstrual cycle. Risks which are not modifiable remain the same for
men and women.



Cardiovascular diseases are for some reasons not fully detected in
women and more so in younger ones. Women are less referred to heart
specialists, less hospitalized and so they are prescribed for
medicine and treatment less than men. Similarly, they are less
referred for exercise testing and echocardiography. Treatment of
cardiovascular diseases for women normally starts with their second
heart attack. Women respond differently to treatment than men. It
requires more research work to understand the different response to
same treatment in men and women.


The
cardiovascular response to sexual activity in men and women is
similar to other daily activities and not excessive between couples
in a long-standing relationship. The risk of an ischemic event during
sexual activity is low and death very uncommon. Sexual dysfunction is
common in cardiac patients and, in men, may occur before cardiac
symptoms, with a time interval of 2 to 5 years (Jackson, 2009).
Chances of coital sudden death are very rare. In three large studies,
death related to sexual activity was 0.6% in Japan, 0.18% in
Frankfurt, and 1.7% in Berlin. Extramarital sex was responsible for
75%, 75%, and 77%, respectively; and the victims were men in 82%,
94%, and 93% of cases, respectively (Drory, 2002). Moreover, much of
the research literature in this field has now identified erectile
dysfunction (ED) as an indicator of silent coronary artery disease
(Hodges, Kirby, Solanki, O’Donnell, & Brodie, 2007).



Table 1: (Mackay and Mensah)









































































































































































































































































































































































































Country



Population
in millions (2002)



Heart
Disease



Stroke



Rheumatic
Heart Disease



Smoking
Prevalence


Percentage
of smokers 18 years or above


2003
or latest available data



Diabetes


Percentage
of people


aged
20 years and above


with
diabetes


2000



Disability


DALYS
lost/1000 population


2003
or latest available data



Mortality


Number
of deaths


2002



Disability


DALYS
lost/1000 population


2003
or latest available data



Mortality


Number
of deaths


2002



MEN



Women



Austria



8.111



6



15,418



4



7,559



185



37.4%



26.3%



3.8%



Belgium



10.296



5



14,985



4



9,234



68



33.2%



22.9%



4.0%



Brazil



176.257



9



139,601



11



129,172



3,055



29.4%



18.4%



4.3%



Canada



31.271



5



43,246



3



15,621



422



30.0%



26.6%



8.8%



China



1,294.867



4



702,925



12



1,652,885



97,245



58.9%



3.6%



2.4%



Egypt



70.507



21



103,829



8



35,054



3,398



47.9%



1.8%



7.2%



France



59.850



3



46,132



3



37,750



1,136



42.6%



33.9%



3.9%



Germany



82.414



6



172,717



4



79,326



2,241



39.0%



30.9%



4.1%



Greece



10.970



7



16,825



6



22,694



10



53.5%



33.6%



10.3%



India



1,049.549



20



1,531,534



10



771,067



103,913



34.6%



3.4%



5.5%



Israel



6.304



4



5,705



3



2,233



170



35.8%



19.7%



6.7%



Italy



57.482



4



92,928



4



69,075



1,790



37.9%



29.7%



9.2%



Japan



127.478



3



90,196



5



134,952



2,585



52.5%



12.4%



6.7%



Malaysia



23.965



8



13,445



7



10,169



464



52.4%



3.0%



7.6%



Mexico



101.965



6



51,454



4



26,478



1,093



36.5%



14.3%



3.9%



Netherlands



16.067



5



19,045



4



12,459



16



38.3%



32.8%



3.5%



Norway



4.514



5



8,886



3



4,817



103



40.3%



39.0%



3.9%



Pakistan



149.911



18



154,338



9



78,512



11,604



30.3%



3.8%



7.75



Philippines



78.580



10



45,378



7



24,368



2,812



59.6%



13.8%



7.1%



Russian
Federation



144,082



27



674,881



19



517,424



8,126



58.1%



15.8%



4.2%



Saudi
Arabia



23.520



17



16,438



4



3,818



126



29.1%



1.2%



9.3%



Singapore



4.183



7



3,946



3



17,16



39



23.7%



3.2%



11.4%



South
Africa



44.759



9



27,013



11



30,306



792



42.4%



13.9%



3.4%



Spain



40.997



4



45,018



3



34,880



1,738



43.9%



31.2%



8.7%



Sri
Lanka



18.910



8



16,297



7



13,348



175



38.7%



3.1%



5.4%



Sweden



8.867



5



20,122



3



9,984



143



21.3%



24.9%



4.3%



Switzerland



7.171



4



10,746



2



4,508



112



37.6%



28.3%



3.9%



Turkey



70.318



16



102,552



13



62,782



1,584



51.1%



18.5%



7.3%



United
Kingdom



59.068



7



120,530



4



59,322



1,712



34.6%



34.4%



3.9%



United
States of America



291.038



8



514,540



4



163,768



3,479



27.8%



22.3%



8.8%



You
might know someone in friends or family who has had a heart attack or
a stroke (a brain attack). These cardiovascular diseases are
responsible for more and more people dying around the world. The
survivors of these diseases often require long term medication, care
and treatment. Moreover, these diseases can seriously affect the
lives of patients and their families and the results can even
influence the community, and yet so many heart attacks could have
been prevented. A lot of damage to blood vessels starts at very young
age. Children should therefore be taught to have a balanced and
healthy diet. Special care is also needed to keep children physically
active.


If
you think you have a risk then you should be on a lookout for
indications and you need to take steps to avoid the disease. The
following simple advices might help you to reduce the risks to a
minimum:




  • Stop smoking



  • Engaging in physical activity for at least 30 minutes on most days
    of the week



  • Have fruits and vegetables at least five times a day



  • Reduce your salt intake to one teaspoon a day



  • Have your blood pressure checked regularly



  • If you are diabetic, control your blood sugar and blood pressure



  • Try maintaining ideal body weight



  • Make prior arrangements for accessibility to help in case of an
    emergency



  • Have a detailed medical check every year



A
major heart attack is called a myocardial infarction. It usually
starts with pain or discomfort in the centre of the chest, which
lasts for more than a few minutes or keeps coming back. The
discomfort can feel like pressure, squeezing, or fullness. Pain or
discomfort may also be felt in the arms, the left shoulder, elbows,
jaw, or back. Other symptoms include:



• difficulty in breathing or shortness of breath



• feeling sick or vomiting



• feeling light-headed or faint



• breaking into a cold sweat



• becoming pale


Women
are more likely to have shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, and
back or jaw pain. People who have had diabetes for a long time may
not feel the chest pain as much, because diabetes can damage the
nerves.


Many
people who have a heart attack die before reaching the hospital. So
act fast, every second counts. Have someone call an ambulance or take
you to the hospital right away.



Works Cited


Drory,
Y. (2002). Sexual activity and cardiovascular risk. European Heart
Journal, 4(Suppl. H), H13–H18.


Hodges,
L. D., Kirby, M., Solanki, J., O’Donnell, J., & Brodie, D.
A. (2007). The temporal relationship between erectile dysfunction and
cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Clinical Practice,
61, 2019–2025.


Jackson,
G. (2008). Gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention.
Menopause International, 14, 13–17.



Jackson, Graham. "Sexual Response in Cardiovascular Disease."
Journal of Sex Research 46.2/3 (May 2009): 233-236. Academic
Search Elite
. EBSCO. 3 Apr. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=37184441&site=ehost-live>.


Mackay,
J., and Mensah, G,. Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. World
Health Organization, 2004.



090404001 FDA's regulation of medical devices



FDA’s REGULATION OF MEDICAL DEVICES


We
must not make a scarecrow of the law, setting it up to fear the birds
of prey, and let it keep one shape, till custom make it their perch
and not their terror.”
William Shakespeare
(1564–1616), English poet and playwright.
(Microsft Corporation)


Congressional
investigators concluded in a report that most medical devices have
never been shown to be safe and tested and the procedure for doing so
must change for the devices which carry the highest of risks. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) had promised for a long a time that
this problem would be fixed but apparently this has not happened,
which prompted Government Accountability Office to state in their
report that “it is imperative that F.D.A. take immediate steps”
to fix its system of approving devices. Various consumer agencies
have also complained that FDA was failing in protecting the public,
whereas, the industry groups also agreed that there were flaws in the
procedure per se. (Harris, Report Criticizes F.D.A. on
Device Testing)


Internal
FDA documents revealed that an FDA official went against FDA
scientists and approved the sale of an imaging device for breast
cancer when he received a phone call from a Connecticut congressman.
This phone call and its affect on the organization are recorded along
with many other accusations in important documents of this
science-based organization. FDA documents which are part of an
internal investigation were provided to The New York Times. These
documents indicate that the scientists within believe that the staff
has become too lenient in their standards of approving devices.
Scientists, within the organization, have criticized the process by
which many of the devices are approved without extensive testing.
(Harris, In F.D.A. Files, Claims of Rush to Approve Devices)


A
surgeon referred a patient of breast cancer, after surgery, for a
newer form of treatment where radioactive seeds are transplanted in
place where the tumor had been removed. It takes only five days as
compared to six weeks for conventional treatment. The system used to
administer this form of treatment is called MammoSite. This system is
among the many others which FDA allows for sale in market after a
quick test with no clear evidence if this might be helpful to
patients or not. FDA officials defend the cursory review process as a
way of promoting innovating technology. As newer products are simply
an improved over already approved products so they justify that there
is hardly a need for extensive tests as per procedure. Demanding
lengthy study of such devices would be “very, very
inappropriate and a waste of resources,” said Dr. Daniel G.
Schultz, the director of the F.D.A.’s Center for Devices and
Radiological Health. Even after six years of use, specialists are
still skeptical about the effectivity and benefits of MammoSite. Its
sale and use was allowed in the market only after a study that
involved 25 women who did not answer the fundamental questions about
its affectivity. (Abelson)


Medical
device manufacturers are not being scrutinized properly by FDA.
According to the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), the FDA's
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) allows
manufacturers and testing facilities to monitor their own compliance
with federal regulations meant to insure the safety of medical
devices. (Alonso)


Critics
are of the opinion that devices should get the same scrutiny as drugs
do. While the process of scrutinizing drugs is not perfect but a new
drug is studied in hundreds or sometimes in thousands of patients
before it is approved as safe and effective by FDA. “Nobody is
looking to see whether they help patients, we’re never going to
wisely allocate resources in health care unless we start to focus on
what’s best for patients.” said Diane C. Robertson, an
executive with the ECRI Institute, which evaluates new devices for
insurers and hospitals. (Abelson)


A
report from POGO states that it seems that FDA decided to ignore the
Good Laboratories Practices (GLP) regulations. GLP is meant to
protect patients from unsafe drugs and devices by forbidding
manufacturers to set their own standards. This decision was made over
strong objection from FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological
Health (CDRH) scientists. "There are many insiders who are
deeply concerned that real harm is being done. Such a decision
affecting public health should not have been made behind closed
doors." This is not the first time the FDA has
been criticized for its oversight of medical devices. In January
2009, the Government Accountability Office issued a report that
criticized the agency for failing to conduct appropriate medical
device reviews. In the same month, a group of FDA scientists wrote to
then President-elect Obama imploring him to reform the agency, which
they characterized as corrupt. The letter explained that that FDA's
regulation of medical devices was “corrupted and distorted by
current FDA managers, thereby placing the American people at risk.”
The letter also provided specifics about how scientists who differed
in opinion from FDA management were threatened with disciplinary
action. (Alonso)


Diana
Zuckerman, president of the National Research Center for Women and
Families, said the Bush administration had “finally made the
device approval process so meaningless that it’s intolerable to
the scientists who work there.” Ms. Zuckerman, a longtime
critic of the agency’s device approval process, particularly as
it relates to breast implants, added, “Virtually everything
gets approved, no matter what.” (Harris, In
F.D.A. Files, Claims of Rush to Approve Devices)


Why
have regulations which cannot be implemented to the letter and
spirit? Leaving out the spirit always results in a general disregard
for letter as well.



Works Cited


Abelson,
Reed. "Quickly Vetted, Treatment Is Offered to Patients."
The New York Times 26 October 2008.


Alonso,
Parker Waichman. "YourLawyer.com." 18 February 2009. Parker
Waichman Alonso LLP.
5 April 2009
<http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/16085>.


Harris,
Gardiner. "In F.D.A. Files, Claims of Rush to Approve Devices."
The New York Times 12 January 2009.


—.
"Report Criticizes F.D.A. on Device Testing." The New
York Times
15 January 2009.


Microsft
Corporation. "Law." Encarta Book of Quotations.
1999. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 1999.











090331001 Capital Punishment



CAPITAL PUNISHMENT


The
first and foremost of the three major steps to prevent immoral
activities in a society is to teach the people of that society to the
extent that they consider from within their hearts that the subject
activity is immoral and one should restrain from getting involved in
such an activity. No society comprises of wholly good people and the
level of perception varies from individual to individual. Similarly,
it cannot be said that any society only has bad people in it.
Societies are always a mixture of many kinds of persons. Therefore,
it is not appropriate to consider that the teachings would have the
same effect on each and every individual of a community or society.
As such, it becomes necessary, for those who are responsible, to
restrict access to resources which could give rise to immoral
activities. This could again be something very difficult or
impossible to practically seal out such resources. With easy access
to resources which are required to do something good, one could
easily mend them for subversive uses. Punishments come into the
process, of correcting which was not corrected otherwise, as a last
resort when every other effort had failed.


Not
only with regards to capital punishment but to all sorts of them, it
would be unjustified to punish any individual for the committed
wrongdoing unless the first two steps have been executed in their
true spirit. As such, it can easily be deduced that a person does not
deserve punishment unless he or she had been properly notified of the
consequences and there were all the necessary efforts made to keep
the person away from harmful act. Telling or teaching someone not to
steal is good but not good enough. You don’t have to leave your
cash out in the street because you think everyone now believes that
stealing is bad. By doing so you would be putting one’s
temptation on trial and that is not fair as well. Someone might be
tempted to steal purely because of an urgent need. Therefore, in a
society where access to arms is not only unrestricted but allowed and
encouraged or there are not enough measures by the government to
protect the lives and property of individuals and they are forced to
take defensive measures, there is always a likelihood that anarchy
would prevail. For as much, we should consider twice before
committing anyone to capital punishment, had we fulfilled our
responsibility. Moreover, what is to be gained by capital punishment?
Two things come to mind when one faces that question, correction (of
society) and compensation (for the loved ones of victim).


Why
do nations go to war? Certainly not to capture prisoners of war and
feed them for the rest of the duration the dialogs go on. Nations go
to war as a last resort when all efforts fail to achieve what they
consider necessary. Wars are a means of correcting the opponent
nations or making them see what we believe is right. Every soldier
out there knows that he is to kill or else be killed. Similarly,
punishments are a means of correction when every other effort fails.


Capital
punishment or death penalty is a process of executing convicted
criminal under the authority of government. United States is one of
the 74 countries which allow death penalty and it stands fourth in
the number of criminals executed each year. It has become an
international issue and its unpredictable results concerning legal,
moral and economical issues are discussed throughout the world. The
main debatable issues concerning capital punishment are regarding the
effectiveness of capital punishment to serve as deterrent against
crime, ethical and moral standing of executions sanctioned by
government, likelihood of errors of judgment and prejudiced biasing.
These discussions are normally categorized into two classes, public
opinion and legislative issues. Public opinion relates to issues of
capital punishment being religiously or morally right or wrong, or to
the usefulness of it. Legislative issues are concerned about the
death penalty in relation to national laws, and whether government
agencies are capable of administering penalties in accordance with
the law (Issitt).


Besides
the philosophical reasoning the weaknesses in our legal system lend
much support to those who oppose capital punishment. After a New
Hampshire court awarded death sentence, first ever after fifty years,
to Michael Addison for killing a police officer,
the house elected to do away with death penalty after three
months of the sentence by a vote of 193 to 174. Democrat Gov. John
Lynch said he would veto the bill. The opponents of capital
punishment questioned the fairness after a millionaire, John Brooks,
received a life sentence for killing a repairman through hired
killers. They say that Addison could not afford a lawyer or else he
would not have been sentenced for death (THE ASSOCIATED PRESS).


About
74 nations still enforce death penalty and another 25 nations still
have laws supporting capital punishment but have not enforced them
through the last decade. 86 nations have abolished capital punishment
for all crimes. US was ranked fourth with 59 executions in 2004m
whereas, China stood out on the top with 3,400 executions in 2004
followed by Iran and Vietnam. According to a poll in 2006, 71%
Americans favor death penalty for some crimes while 65% do not
consider it to be immoral (Issit).


The
issue of death penalty as deterrent remains controversial.
Statistical studies show that number of violent crimes has decreased
with increase in number of executions, in United States. The
controversy takes its roots from the fact that it has been indicated
that crime rates are lower in states where capital punishment has
been abolished. Those for and against, both, have not yet been able
to bring forward evidence which can conclusively support their point
of view regarding capital punishment being a deterrent.


Support
for death penalty shows a downward trend in United States over the
past twenty years. Some people have escaped the horror of death
penalty with the help of DNA technology. This has made many minds
doubtful about competency of our legal system. In a Congressional
ruling of 2004, all inmates on death row were declared eligible for
further investigation where DNA evidence was available.


The
question of fairness of judgment has also been raised as studies show
that race and status have had their effect judgments. Both sides have
argued by quoting examples from history but the moral issues
regarding capital punishment are a matter of personal opinion.


Let’s
put our differences aside for a short while and look at the problem
rationally. Most of the literature available on the subject indicates
that more people are against capital punishment because of unfairness
in this regard and the torture that the inmates have to go through.
“From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the
machinery of death,” wrote United States Supreme Court Justice
Harry A. Blackmun in renouncing his support for the death penalty as
a constitutional means of punishment. In February 1994, Blackmun
dissented in the court’s decision in Callins v. Collins.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion,
upholding the constitutionality of the death penalty (Zimring).


The
basic reason why the movement against capital punishment is gaining
support is that many times innocent people have been executed.
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to
a group of women lawyers in Minnesota that "the system may well
be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed." In 1997
American Bar Association, which does not side with any party, for or
against capital punishment, passed a resolution to halt capital
punishment “to minimize the risk that innocent persons may be
executed.” Acceptance of DNA testing is another major factor
that has brought the question of innocence to limelight (Innocence
and the Death Penalty).


Whatever
the reasons may be but states are thinking about their policies
regarding capital punishments. The backing of Catholics and other
movements is turning the tide against capital punishment in United
States (Mulvaney).


In
one particular case a Northwestern University undergraduate from
investigative journalism class, along with her other classmates,
unearthed the truth about an eyewitness and proved that the she could
not have seen whatever was claimed to be seen and thus saved a person
who was already on a death row. Thirteen other such investigations
resulted in exonerations in Illinois when George Ryan was governor of
the state. Later, Ryan called a moratorium on state’s death
penalty (White).


The
legislative issues related with capital punishment have been
politicized to an extent that they have lost their spirit (Gordon).
May it be those in favor or may it be those against. Both sides lack
rudimentary rationalism in their arguments. Those against have taken
the support of religion and though religion might not have played its
part in other fields but it seems very active and spirited in
abolishing of capital punishment (White). Had religion played the
role which it was required to play then there might not have been as
many cases of people facing death penalty.


Those
in favor have not enough arguments to convince the other side. As a
result, those in favor of capital punishment are losing support
gradually and it seems that abolishment of capital punishment is not
far away in this country.


Despite
lack of evidence from either side one thing is very prominent, the
society is yet not ripe to allow capital punishment. There are too
many weaknesses in our legal system and it is far from being fair to
prisoners on a death row. Though many have been exonerated but there
is a possibility that many innocent might have gone to the gallows
because of these weaknesses in our legal system. One such case is of
Paris Carriger. He was released in January 1999 after remaining on
death row for 21 years for the murder of Robert Gibson Shaw.
Carriger’s ordeal, spanning over a period of 21 years
(Carriger), should suffice to convince us that even after centuries
of efforts we were unable to evolve a system based on fairness to
all. Going through Carriger’s recollections pose another
question regarding the cruelty faced by prisoners on death row. How
can we expect a man to live a normal life after keeping him on a
death row for 21 years.


Even
before we attempt to answer the question regarding capital
punishment, we should rather ask ourselves, “How many more
Carrigers are we willing to produce?”










Works
Cited






THE
ASSOCIATED PRESS. "New Hampshire: Vote To Repeal Death Penalty."
New York Times (26 Mar. 2009): 20. Academic Search Elite.
EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009


<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=37156624&site=ehost-live>.






Carriger, Paris. "REQUIEM FOR JUSTICE: REFLECTIONS ON 21 YEARS
OF DEATH ROW." Contemporary Justice Review 2.13 (Dec.
1999): 437. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar.
2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=4012848&site=pov-live>.






"Innocence and the Death Penalty." America 07 Feb.
2005: 3. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=15863771&site=pov-live>.






Gordon, Diana R. "Justice Watch: Executioners' Songs."
Nation 251.3 (08 Oct. 1990): 373. Points of View Reference
Center
. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=10416227&site=pov-live>.






"Innocence and the Death Penalty." America 07 Feb.
2005: 3. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=15863771&site=pov-live>.







Issitt, Micha L. "Death Penalty: An Overview." Points of
View: Death Penalty
(Feb. 2007): 1. Points of View Reference
Center
. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=22841133&site=pov-live>.







Mulvaney, Patrick. "States rethink death penalty as national
tide turns." National Catholic Reporter 43.2 (16 Mar.
2007): 5. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=24521455&site=pov-live>.







White, Michele Marie. "Documentary explores debate on death
penalty." National Catholic Reporter 40.0 (16 July 2004):
21. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=13760803&site=pov-live>.






Zimring,
Franklin E. "Capital Punishment." Microsft Encarta 2009.
DVD. Prod. Microsoft Corporation. Redmond, 2008.



090331001 Capital Punishment



CAPITAL PUNISHMENT


The
first and foremost of the three major steps to prevent immoral
activities in a society is to teach the people of that society to the
extent that they consider from within their hearts that the subject
activity is immoral and one should restrain from getting involved in
such an activity. No society comprises of wholly good people and the
level of perception varies from individual to individual. Similarly,
it cannot be said that any society only has bad people in it.
Societies are always a mixture of many kinds of persons. Therefore,
it is not appropriate to consider that the teachings would have the
same effect on each and every individual of a community or society.
As such, it becomes necessary, for those who are responsible, to
restrict access to resources which could give rise to immoral
activities. This could again be something very difficult or
impossible to practically seal out such resources. With easy access
to resources which are required to do something good, one could
easily mend them for subversive uses. Punishments come into the
process, of correcting which was not corrected otherwise, as a last
resort when every other effort had failed.


Not
only with regards to capital punishment but to all sorts of them, it
would be unjustified to punish any individual for the committed
wrongdoing unless the first two steps have been executed in their
true spirit. As such, it can easily be deduced that a person does not
deserve punishment unless he or she had been properly notified of the
consequences and there were all the necessary efforts made to keep
the person away from harmful act. Telling or teaching someone not to
steal is good but not good enough. You don’t have to leave your
cash out in the street because you think everyone now believes that
stealing is bad. By doing so you would be putting one’s
temptation on trial and that is not fair as well. Someone might be
tempted to steal purely because of an urgent need. Therefore, in a
society where access to arms is not only unrestricted but allowed and
encouraged or there are not enough measures by the government to
protect the lives and property of individuals and they are forced to
take defensive measures, there is always a likelihood that anarchy
would prevail. For as much, we should consider twice before
committing anyone to capital punishment, had we fulfilled our
responsibility. Moreover, what is to be gained by capital punishment?
Two things come to mind when one faces that question, correction (of
society) and compensation (for the loved ones of victim).


Why
do nations go to war? Certainly not to capture prisoners of war and
feed them for the rest of the duration the dialogs go on. Nations go
to war as a last resort when all efforts fail to achieve what they
consider necessary. Wars are a means of correcting the opponent
nations or making them see what we believe is right. Every soldier
out there knows that he is to kill or else be killed. Similarly,
punishments are a means of correction when every other effort fails.


Capital
punishment or death penalty is a process of executing convicted
criminal under the authority of government. United States is one of
the 74 countries which allow death penalty and it stands fourth in
the number of criminals executed each year. It has become an
international issue and its unpredictable results concerning legal,
moral and economical issues are discussed throughout the world. The
main debatable issues concerning capital punishment are regarding the
effectiveness of capital punishment to serve as deterrent against
crime, ethical and moral standing of executions sanctioned by
government, likelihood of errors of judgment and prejudiced biasing.
These discussions are normally categorized into two classes, public
opinion and legislative issues. Public opinion relates to issues of
capital punishment being religiously or morally right or wrong, or to
the usefulness of it. Legislative issues are concerned about the
death penalty in relation to national laws, and whether government
agencies are capable of administering penalties in accordance with
the law (Issitt).


Besides
the philosophical reasoning the weaknesses in our legal system lend
much support to those who oppose capital punishment. After a New
Hampshire court awarded death sentence, first ever after fifty years,
to Michael Addison for killing a police officer,
the house elected to do away with death penalty after three
months of the sentence by a vote of 193 to 174. Democrat Gov. John
Lynch said he would veto the bill. The opponents of capital
punishment questioned the fairness after a millionaire, John Brooks,
received a life sentence for killing a repairman through hired
killers. They say that Addison could not afford a lawyer or else he
would not have been sentenced for death (THE ASSOCIATED PRESS).


About
74 nations still enforce death penalty and another 25 nations still
have laws supporting capital punishment but have not enforced them
through the last decade. 86 nations have abolished capital punishment
for all crimes. US was ranked fourth with 59 executions in 2004m
whereas, China stood out on the top with 3,400 executions in 2004
followed by Iran and Vietnam. According to a poll in 2006, 71%
Americans favor death penalty for some crimes while 65% do not
consider it to be immoral (Issit).


The
issue of death penalty as deterrent remains controversial.
Statistical studies show that number of violent crimes has decreased
with increase in number of executions, in United States. The
controversy takes its roots from the fact that it has been indicated
that crime rates are lower in states where capital punishment has
been abolished. Those for and against, both, have not yet been able
to bring forward evidence which can conclusively support their point
of view regarding capital punishment being a deterrent.


Support
for death penalty shows a downward trend in United States over the
past twenty years. Some people have escaped the horror of death
penalty with the help of DNA technology. This has made many minds
doubtful about competency of our legal system. In a Congressional
ruling of 2004, all inmates on death row were declared eligible for
further investigation where DNA evidence was available.


The
question of fairness of judgment has also been raised as studies show
that race and status have had their effect judgments. Both sides have
argued by quoting examples from history but the moral issues
regarding capital punishment are a matter of personal opinion.


Let’s
put our differences aside for a short while and look at the problem
rationally. Most of the literature available on the subject indicates
that more people are against capital punishment because of unfairness
in this regard and the torture that the inmates have to go through.
“From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the
machinery of death,” wrote United States Supreme Court Justice
Harry A. Blackmun in renouncing his support for the death penalty as
a constitutional means of punishment. In February 1994, Blackmun
dissented in the court’s decision in Callins v. Collins.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion,
upholding the constitutionality of the death penalty (Zimring).


The
basic reason why the movement against capital punishment is gaining
support is that many times innocent people have been executed.
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to
a group of women lawyers in Minnesota that "the system may well
be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed." In 1997
American Bar Association, which does not side with any party, for or
against capital punishment, passed a resolution to halt capital
punishment “to minimize the risk that innocent persons may be
executed.” Acceptance of DNA testing is another major factor
that has brought the question of innocence to limelight (Innocence
and the Death Penalty).


Whatever
the reasons may be but states are thinking about their policies
regarding capital punishments. The backing of Catholics and other
movements is turning the tide against capital punishment in United
States (Mulvaney).


In
one particular case a Northwestern University undergraduate from
investigative journalism class, along with her other classmates,
unearthed the truth about an eyewitness and proved that the she could
not have seen whatever was claimed to be seen and thus saved a person
who was already on a death row. Thirteen other such investigations
resulted in exonerations in Illinois when George Ryan was governor of
the state. Later, Ryan called a moratorium on state’s death
penalty (White).


The
legislative issues related with capital punishment have been
politicized to an extent that they have lost their spirit (Gordon).
May it be those in favor or may it be those against. Both sides lack
rudimentary rationalism in their arguments. Those against have taken
the support of religion and though religion might not have played its
part in other fields but it seems very active and spirited in
abolishing of capital punishment (White). Had religion played the
role which it was required to play then there might not have been as
many cases of people facing death penalty.


Those
in favor have not enough arguments to convince the other side. As a
result, those in favor of capital punishment are losing support
gradually and it seems that abolishment of capital punishment is not
far away in this country.


Despite
lack of evidence from either side one thing is very prominent, the
society is yet not ripe to allow capital punishment. There are too
many weaknesses in our legal system and it is far from being fair to
prisoners on a death row. Though many have been exonerated but there
is a possibility that many innocent might have gone to the gallows
because of these weaknesses in our legal system. One such case is of
Paris Carriger. He was released in January 1999 after remaining on
death row for 21 years for the murder of Robert Gibson Shaw.
Carriger’s ordeal, spanning over a period of 21 years
(Carriger), should suffice to convince us that even after centuries
of efforts we were unable to evolve a system based on fairness to
all. Going through Carriger’s recollections pose another
question regarding the cruelty faced by prisoners on death row. How
can we expect a man to live a normal life after keeping him on a
death row for 21 years.


Even
before we attempt to answer the question regarding capital
punishment, we should rather ask ourselves, “How many more
Carrigers are we willing to produce?”










Works
Cited






THE
ASSOCIATED PRESS. "New Hampshire: Vote To Repeal Death Penalty."
New York Times (26 Mar. 2009): 20. Academic Search Elite.
EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009


<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=37156624&site=ehost-live>.






Carriger, Paris. "REQUIEM FOR JUSTICE: REFLECTIONS ON 21 YEARS
OF DEATH ROW." Contemporary Justice Review 2.13 (Dec.
1999): 437. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar.
2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=4012848&site=pov-live>.






"Innocence and the Death Penalty." America 07 Feb.
2005: 3. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=15863771&site=pov-live>.






Gordon, Diana R. "Justice Watch: Executioners' Songs."
Nation 251.3 (08 Oct. 1990): 373. Points of View Reference
Center
. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=10416227&site=pov-live>.






"Innocence and the Death Penalty." America 07 Feb.
2005: 3. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=15863771&site=pov-live>.







Issitt, Micha L. "Death Penalty: An Overview." Points of
View: Death Penalty
(Feb. 2007): 1. Points of View Reference
Center
. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=22841133&site=pov-live>.







Mulvaney, Patrick. "States rethink death penalty as national
tide turns." National Catholic Reporter 43.2 (16 Mar.
2007): 5. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=24521455&site=pov-live>.







White, Michele Marie. "Documentary explores debate on death
penalty." National Catholic Reporter 40.0 (16 July 2004):
21. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. 31 Mar. 2009
<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=13760803&site=pov-live>.






Zimring,
Franklin E. "Capital Punishment." Microsft Encarta 2009.
DVD. Prod. Microsoft Corporation. Redmond, 2008.